jun ae104919e0 Change linalg mat_inverse.
Still not sure whether it's better to calculate
rref[pivot_row][col] * (rref[row][pivot_col] / pivot_val) (option 1)
vs.
rref[pivot_row][col] * rref[row][pivot_col] / pivot_val   (option 2)

(i.e.  a * b / c vs. "a * (b/c))

in terms of floating point error.

But I think option 1 (current commit) is better, since the scale factor
(rref[row][pivot_col] / pivot_val) is always <= 1 here (I think).
2025-03-07 21:24:53 +01:00
2025-01-03 10:38:57 +01:00
2025-03-07 21:24:53 +01:00
2025-01-03 10:38:57 +01:00
2025-03-07 13:42:28 +01:00
2025-03-07 21:24:53 +01:00
Description
Strongly typed C99 containers etc.
502 KiB
Languages
C 66%
C++ 27.3%
Python 6.1%
CMake 0.6%