189 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
189 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
|
|
|
|
Chords: 1.74806 - the 120-cell has 7200 chords of this length
|
|
|
|
Looking for a way to partition the 600 vertices of the 120 cell into five
|
|
disjoint 600-cells, each of which has 120 vertices.
|
|
|
|
(there are 10 such 600-cells so two ways to do the partition I guess)
|
|
|
|
a 600-cell has 720 edges! optimistically this means that each chord in the
|
|
collection of 7200 belongs to one and only one of the 600-cells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the way forward:
|
|
|
|
I need to take the 7200 chords (pairs of nodes) and divide them into sets
|
|
which are connected to one another - with any luck, each of these will be
|
|
one of the 10 600-cells
|
|
|
|
Then need to sort these 10 sets of 120 vertices into the two sets of 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
collate chords by node
|
|
|
|
Each 120-cell vertex has 24 of the chord3s from it - as a 600-cell has 12
|
|
edges to each vertex, this suggests that each 120-vertex belongs to two
|
|
600-cells with a disjoint set of vertices
|
|
|
|
Next algorithm - gather each 600-cell
|
|
|
|
use the chords as the basis for this.
|
|
|
|
n1 -> 24 chords -> add these 24 neighbours
|
|
|
|
bad luck - traversing chord3s from the first vertex reaches all 600 vertices-
|
|
which isn't suprising as the two 5 disjoint sets overlap. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
Use the angles between the chords? seems a bit complex
|
|
|
|
Get the angles from the 600-cell model. Use these to separate out the sets of
|
|
24 chords from a point on the 120-cell.
|
|
|
|
Notes from dinner:
|
|
|
|
- all of the 60-degree angles are chords joining the vertices of the tetrahedra
|
|
- there should be two sets of these
|
|
|
|
for eg - this works for the chords from 1!
|
|
|
|
[ 25, 41 ],
|
|
[ 25, 97 ],
|
|
[ 25, 109 ],
|
|
[ 25, 157 ],
|
|
[ 25, 161 ],
|
|
[ 41, 97 ],
|
|
[ 41, 109 ],
|
|
[ 41, 173 ],
|
|
[ 41, 177 ],
|
|
[ 97, 113 ],
|
|
[ 97, 161 ],
|
|
[ 97, 177 ],
|
|
[ 37, 53 ],
|
|
[ 37, 93 ],
|
|
[ 37, 113 ],
|
|
[ 37, 157 ],
|
|
[ 37, 161 ],
|
|
[ 53, 93 ],
|
|
[ 53, 113 ],
|
|
[ 53, 173 ],
|
|
[ 53, 177 ],
|
|
[ 173, 177 ]
|
|
[ 93, 109 ],
|
|
[ 93, 157 ],
|
|
[ 93, 173 ],
|
|
[ 109, 157 ],
|
|
[ 109, 173 ],
|
|
[ 113, 161 ],
|
|
[ 113, 177 ],
|
|
[ 157, 161 ],
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ 29, 45 ], 5
|
|
[ 29, 101 ], 101
|
|
[ 29, 105 ], 105
|
|
[ 29, 153 ], 153
|
|
[ 29, 165 ], 165
|
|
[ 45, 101 ],
|
|
[ 45, 105 ],
|
|
[ 45, 169 ], 169
|
|
[ 45, 181 ], 181
|
|
[ 101, 117 ], 117
|
|
[ 101, 165 ],
|
|
[ 101, 181 ],
|
|
[ 105, 153 ],
|
|
[ 105, 169 ],
|
|
[ 33, 49 ], 33 49
|
|
[ 33, 89 ], 89
|
|
[ 33, 117 ],
|
|
[ 33, 153 ],
|
|
[ 33, 165 ],
|
|
[ 49, 89 ],
|
|
[ 49, 117 ],
|
|
[ 49, 169 ],
|
|
[ 49, 181 ],
|
|
[ 169, 181 ],
|
|
[ 89, 105 ],
|
|
[ 89, 153 ],
|
|
[ 89, 169 ],
|
|
[ 117, 165 ],
|
|
[ 117, 181 ],
|
|
[ 153, 165 ],
|
|
|
|
|
|
So each of these is one of the two icosahedral pyramids from node 1.
|
|
|
|
Doing this manually for the rest of the partition is possible, but could it
|
|
be automated based on angles?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan for Sunday:
|
|
|
|
* use the existing label_subgraph to make a function which partitions the
|
|
60-angle chords into two groups (like I did manually above)
|
|
|
|
// this is done and seems to work
|
|
|
|
* test this labelling manually (ie colour one set of 60-angle vertices)
|
|
|
|
// done this with the manual labels and it looks good
|
|
|
|
* make another labeling routine which can fill out the rest of the 600-cell
|
|
from the starting dodecahedron, by only following chords which are at 60
|
|
to the entering chord
|
|
|
|
Then the big algorithm does the following:
|
|
|
|
- start from node 1, find 60-angles, pick one partition at random, label that 600-cell
|
|
|
|
- find the next unlabelled node
|
|
|
|
- find 60-angles, partition them, pick a partition with no unlabelled cells and label that 600-cell
|
|
|
|
- repeat the previous step for the remaining three 600-cells
|
|
|
|
Alternative, more manual option: just write the second labelling routine and
|
|
do the rest by hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ 25, 41 ],
|
|
[ 25, 97 ],
|
|
[ 25, 109 ],
|
|
[ 25, 157 ],
|
|
[ 25, 161 ],
|
|
[ 41, 97 ],
|
|
[ 41, 109 ],
|
|
[ 41, 173 ],
|
|
[ 41, 177 ],
|
|
[ 97, 113 ],
|
|
[ 97, 161 ],
|
|
[ 97, 177 ],
|
|
[ 37, 53 ],
|
|
[ 37, 93 ],
|
|
[ 37, 113 ],
|
|
[ 37, 157 ],
|
|
[ 37, 161 ],
|
|
[ 53, 93 ],
|
|
[ 53, 113 ],
|
|
[ 53, 173 ],
|
|
[ 53, 177 ],
|
|
[ 173, 177 ]
|
|
[ 93, 109 ],
|
|
[ 93, 157 ],
|
|
[ 93, 173 ],
|
|
[ 109, 157 ],
|
|
[ 109, 173 ],
|
|
[ 113, 161 ],
|
|
[ 113, 177 ],
|
|
[ 157, 161 ],
|
|
25 41 97 109
|
|
157 161 173 177
|
|
113 37 53 93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another idea - look at colouring the vertices of a dodecahedron according to
|
|
the four compound tetrahedra and see if this can be repeated automatically to
|
|
neighbouring cells
|
|
|